On 09/10/2023 16:24, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 10/9/23 15:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 09/10/2023 15:49, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> On 10/5/23 21:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 04/10/2023 11:15, Hugues Fruchet wrote: >>>>> Add STM32MP25 VENC video encoder bindings. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't understand why this binding is separate from video decoder. >>>> Merge them. >>> VDEC and VENC are two independent IPs with their own clock, reset, >>> interrupt & register set, they have their own access to APB/AXI bus. >>> Moreover future chipsets may embed only VENC or VDEC. >>> >>> Hoping that this clarifies the reason of two different bindings. >> >> No, it does not. These are no reasons to have independent bindings, >> except when having actual impact on the bindings. The bindings look >> identical. What are the differences? > I'm sorry but I really don't understand your point, these are two > different IPs with very different registers in it, so why should > I share that in a single binding ? Because the binding is identical. If not, maybe I missed something, so please point me to differences in the binding. Best regards, Krzysztof
