[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Drop unused labels from examples

[Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
so drop them.

This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
alltogether, do that.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
index 55e931ba5b47..9fa568603930 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ examples:
         interrupt-controller;
         #interrupt-cells = <4>;
 
-        pmi8998_lsid0: pmic@2 {
+        pmic@2 {
             compatible = "qcom,pmi8998", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
             reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
             #address-cells = <1>;
             #size-cells = <0>;
 
-            pmi8998_gpio: gpio@c000 {
+            gpio@c000 {
                 compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
                 reg = <0xc000>;
                 gpio-controller;
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ examples:
             };
         };
 
-        pm6150_gpio: gpio@c000 {
+        gpio@c000 {
             compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
             reg = <0xc000>;
             gpio-controller;

-- 
2.42.0