On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The ixp4xx bindings are lacking some of the devices we have > out there in the wild, so let's add them. > > The "linksys,wrv54g", "gemtek,gtwx5715", "intel,ixp42x" > triplet is a pretty special case where the Gemtek device is > licensed as OEM product by Linksys (now Belkin) hence the > special entry for this one. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > index 553dcbc70e35..1fecd4692a62 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel-ixp4xx.yaml > @@ -16,12 +16,30 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - items: > - enum: > + - adieng,coyote > + - arcom,vulcan > + - dlink,dsm-g600-a > + - freecom,fsg-3 > + - gateway,7001 > + - gateworks,gw2348 > + - goramo,multilink-router > + - intel,ixdp425 > + - intel,ixdpg425 > + - iom,nas-100d > - linksys,nslu2 > + - netgear,wg302v1 > + - netgear,wg302v2 > + - usr,8200 > - welltech,epbx100 > - const: intel,ixp42x > + - items: > + - const: linksys,wrv54g > + - const: gemtek,gtwx5715 > + - const: intel,ixp42x One question, not so much about this particular case, but is there no "standalone" version of the gtwx5715 sold by gemtek? Asking as I don't see it in the enum above. The description sounds like it is both a product in its own right & sold rebadged. Thanks, Conor. > - items: > - enum: > - gateworks,gw2358 > + - intel,kixrp435 > - const: intel,ixp43x > > additionalProperties: true > > -- > 2.41.0 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
