On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:36:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:15:05 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > The Arm Ltd board bindings are a bit unusual in that they define child > > > nodes for various syscon's. The schemas are also incomplete as they lack > > > constraints on having additional properties and some properties are > > > missing. As the bindings for the different platforms only vary by > > > compatibles, combine them into a single schema doc. > > > > > > Add the "arm,im-pd1-syscon" compatible which was not documented. Add > > > "ranges", "#address-cells", and "#size-cells properties which were > > > missing. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/arm/arm,integrator.yaml | 39 ----------- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,realview.yaml | 37 ---------- > > > .../bindings/arm/arm,versatile.yaml | 40 +++-------- > > > .../mfd/arm,dev-platforms-syscon.yaml | 67 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/arm,dev-platforms-syscon.yaml > > > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > Errr ... I'm a little torn. > > Do I trust the maintainer or his bot? :) New version fixing the example coming... Rob
