Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13/09/2023 10:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>
> >>> + clock-names = "nssnoc_nsscc", "nssnoc_snoc", "nssnoc_snoc_1",
> >>> + "bias_pll_cc_clk", "bias_pll_nss_noc_clk",
> >>> + "bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk", "gpll0_out_aux", "uniphy0_nss_rx_clk",
> >>> + "uniphy0_nss_tx_clk", "uniphy1_nss_rx_clk",
> >>> + "uniphy1_nss_tx_clk", "uniphy2_nss_rx_clk",
> >>> + "uniphy2_nss_tx_clk", "xo_board_clk";
> >>
> >> You are using clock indices. Please drop clock-names.
> >
> > What do you mean by "using clock indices"?
> > Note that the "clock-names" property is required according to the DT bindings.
>
> Indeed, thanks for pointing this out. Probably bindings should be changed.
But what's so great about not having "clock-names"?
There are _14_ input clocks.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
