Hello Ben, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:33:02AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On 07/09/2023 22:34, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > + duty *= NSEC_PER_SEC; > > > + period *= NSEC_PER_SEC; > > > > A comment that/why this cannot overflow would be nice. (I didn't check, > > maybe it can?) > > I /think/ that as long as NSEC_PER_SEC 2^32 then this shouldn't > overflow. I guess NSEC_PER_SEC won't change in the near future :-) double checking and writing the result down in a comment would be appreciated. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
