[PATCH v9 4/6] pwm: dwc: use clock rate in hz to avoid rounding issues

[Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As noted, the clock-rate when not a nice multiple of ns is probably
going to end up with inacurate calculations, as well as on a non pci
system the rate may change (although we've not put a clock rate
change notifier in this code yet) so we also add some quick checks
of the rate when we do any calculations with it.

Signed-off-by; Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v9:
 - fixed commit spelling
 - changed to use codethink email instead of sifive
v8:
 - fixup post rename
 - move to earlier in series
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h      |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c
index 3fc281a78c9a..3b856685029d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c
@@ -49,13 +49,14 @@ static int __dwc_pwm_configure_timer(struct dwc_pwm *dwc,
 	 * periods and check are the result within HW limits between 1 and
 	 * 2^32 periods.
 	 */
-	tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(state->duty_cycle, dwc->clk_ns);
+	tmp = state->duty_cycle * dwc->clk_rate;
+	tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
 	if (tmp < 1 || tmp > (1ULL << 32))
 		return -ERANGE;
 	low = tmp - 1;
 
-	tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(state->period - state->duty_cycle,
-				    dwc->clk_ns);
+	tmp = (state->period - state->duty_cycle) * dwc->clk_rate;
+	tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
 	if (tmp < 1 || tmp > (1ULL << 32))
 		return -ERANGE;
 	high = tmp - 1;
@@ -121,11 +122,14 @@ static int dwc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			     struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	struct dwc_pwm *dwc = to_dwc_pwm(chip);
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
 	u64 duty, period;
 	u32 ctrl, ld, ld2;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
 
+	clk_rate = dwc->clk_rate;
+
 	ctrl = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
 	ld = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT(pwm->hwpwm));
 	ld2 = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT2(pwm->hwpwm));
@@ -137,17 +141,19 @@ static int dwc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	 * based on the timer load-count only.
 	 */
 	if (ctrl & DWC_TIM_CTRL_PWM) {
-		duty = (ld + 1) * dwc->clk_ns;
-		period = (ld2 + 1)  * dwc->clk_ns;
+		duty = ld + 1;
+		period = ld2 + 1;
 		period += duty;
 	} else {
-		duty = (ld + 1) * dwc->clk_ns;
+		duty = ld + 1;
 		period = duty * 2;
 	}
 
+	duty *= NSEC_PER_SEC;
+	period *= NSEC_PER_SEC;
+	state->period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(period, clk_rate);
+	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(duty, clk_rate);
 	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
-	state->period = period;
-	state->duty_cycle = duty;
 
 	pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
 
@@ -168,7 +174,7 @@ struct dwc_pwm *dwc_pwm_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	if (!dwc)
 		return NULL;
 
-	dwc->clk_ns = 10;
+	dwc->clk_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / 10;
 	dwc->chip.dev = dev;
 	dwc->chip.ops = &dwc_pwm_ops;
 	dwc->chip.npwm = DWC_TIMERS_TOTAL;
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
index 64795247c54c..e0a940fd6e87 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct dwc_pwm_ctx {
 struct dwc_pwm {
 	struct pwm_chip chip;
 	void __iomem *base;
-	unsigned int clk_ns;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
 	struct dwc_pwm_ctx ctx[DWC_TIMERS_TOTAL];
 };
 #define to_dwc_pwm(p)	(container_of((p), struct dwc_pwm, chip))
-- 
2.40.1