If we are not in PWM mode, then the output is technically a 50% output based on a single timer instead of the high-low based on the two counters. Add a check for the PWM mode in dwc_pwm_get_state() and if DWC_TIM_CTRL_PWM is not set, then return a 50% cycle. This may only be an issue on initialisation, as the rest of the code currently assumes we're always going to have the extended PWM mode using two counters. Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v9: - fixed multi-line comment - put authour back to codethink email from sifive v8: - fixed rename issues v4: - fixed review comment on mulit-line calculations --- drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c index 4b4b7b9e1d82..3fc281a78c9a 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-core.c @@ -122,24 +122,32 @@ static int dwc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct dwc_pwm *dwc = to_dwc_pwm(chip); u64 duty, period; + u32 ctrl, ld, ld2; pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev); - state->enabled = !!(dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, - DWC_TIM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm)) & DWC_TIM_CTRL_EN); + ctrl = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm)); + ld = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT(pwm->hwpwm)); + ld2 = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT2(pwm->hwpwm)); - duty = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT(pwm->hwpwm)); - duty += 1; - duty *= dwc->clk_ns; - state->duty_cycle = duty; + state->enabled = !!(ctrl & DWC_TIM_CTRL_EN); - period = dwc_pwm_readl(dwc, DWC_TIM_LD_CNT2(pwm->hwpwm)); - period += 1; - period *= dwc->clk_ns; - period += duty; - state->period = period; + /* + * If we're not in PWM, technically the output is a 50-50 + * based on the timer load-count only. + */ + if (ctrl & DWC_TIM_CTRL_PWM) { + duty = (ld + 1) * dwc->clk_ns; + period = (ld2 + 1) * dwc->clk_ns; + period += duty; + } else { + duty = (ld + 1) * dwc->clk_ns; + period = duty * 2; + } state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; + state->period = period; + state->duty_cycle = duty; pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev); -- 2.40.1