Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm:dts: am3517-evm: Fix LED3/4 pinmux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 1:11 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2023 03:01, Adam Ford wrote:
> > The pinmux for LED3 and LED4 are incorrectly attached to the
> > omap3_pmx_core when they should be connected to the omap3_pmx_wkup
> > pin mux.  This was likely masked by the fact that the bootloader
> > used to do all the pinmuxing.
> >
> > Fixes: 0dbf99542caf ("ARM: dts: am3517-evm: Add User LEDs and Pushbutton")
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This likely cannot apply to the original series, because the file has
> > moved.  I can generate a separate patch for the pre-move device trees
> > if necesssary.  The original location was:
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517-evm.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am3517-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am3517-evm.dts
> > index af9df15274be..738189ddc8d5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am3517-evm.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/am3517-evm.dts
> > @@ -271,13 +271,6 @@ OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x21c4, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0)  /* i2c3_sda */
> >               >;
> >       };
> >
> > -     leds_pins: leds-pins {
> > -             pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > -                     OMAP3_WKUP_IOPAD(0x2a24, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE4) /* jtag_emu0.gpio_11 */
> > -                     OMAP3_WKUP_IOPAD(0x2a26, PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE4) /* jtag_emu1.gpio_31 */
> > -             >;
> > -     };
> > -
> >       mmc1_pins: mmc1-pins {
> >               pinctrl-single,pins = <
> >                       OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2144, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* sdmmc1_clk.sdmmc1_clk */
> > @@ -355,3 +348,12 @@ OMAP3430_CORE2_IOPAD(0x25e2, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE3)      /* etk_d3.hsusb1_data7 */
> >               >;
> >       };
> >  };
> > +
> > +&omap3_pmx_wkup {
> > +     leds_pins: pinmux_leds_pins {
>
> Come on... why moving it and changing the name to incorrect one? Isn't a
> move cut-paste?

I applied a patch from an older branch, so I didn't notice the name
convention changed.  Sorry about that.  I'll re-spin both patches with
the pin-mux naming conventions fixed.

adam
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux