On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:26:49AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 04/09/2023 06:05, Linu Cherian wrote: > > memory-region 0: Reserved trace buffer memory > > > > TMC ETR: When available, use this reserved memory region for > > trace data capture. Same region is used for trace data > > retention after a panic or watchdog reset. > > > > TMC ETF: When available, use this reserved memory region for > > trace data retention synced from internal SRAM after a panic or > > watchdog reset. > > > > memory-region 1: Reserved meta data memory > > > > TMC ETR, ETF: When available, use this memory for register > > snapshot retention synced from hardware registers after a panic > > or watchdog reset. > > Instead of having to use a number to map the memory regions, could > we use > > memory-region-names property to describe the index ? That way it > is much easier to read and is less error prone. You can, but the order should still be defined. > Names could be something like: > > tmc-reserved-trace > tmc-reserved-metadata Names are local to the binding. So 'tmc' is redundant. And everything is a reserved region for 'memory-region', so that's redundant too. Rob
