On 28/08/2023 13:43, Tomer Maimon wrote: >> >>> Which leds to second >>> question - how pinctrl could have @0? It's already taken by SoC! So your >>> DTS here - unit address and ranges - are clearly wrong. >>> >>> >>>> BTW, I have run both dt_binding_check and W=1 dtbs_check, and didn't >>>> see an issue related to the pinctrl: pinctrl@f0800260, do I need to >>>> add another flag to see the issue? >>> >>> Did you read my message last time? I said - it's about DTS, not the binding. > yes, understood doesn't the dtbs_check check the DTS? Yes, it does, and the first error is being reported (just like several others for your DTS...). The second about gpio node, I think is not. Best regards, Krzysztof
