On 23/08/2023 13:32, MD Danish Anwar wrote: > From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > > Add packet timestamping TS and PTP PHC clock support. > > For AM65x and AM64x: > - IEP1 is not used > - IEP0 is configured in shadow mode with 1ms cycle and shared between > Linux and FW. It provides time and TS in number cycles, so special > conversation in ns is required. > - IEP0 shared between PRUeth ports. > - IEP0 supports PPS, periodic output. > - IEP0 settime() and enabling PPS required FW interraction. > - RX TS provided with each packet in CPPI5 descriptor. > - TX TS returned through separate ICSSG hw queues for each port. TX TS > readiness is signaled by INTC IRQ. Only one packet at time can be requested > for TX TS. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx> How patch author could review or not review its own code? How does it even work? I write a patch and for example judge - oh no, it is wrong, but I will still send it, just without my review. Or I write a patch - oh, I like it, I wrote excellent code, let me add review tag for my own code! > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> Where? Best regards, Krzysztof
