On 28/07/23 5:10 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote: >> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml >> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml >> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties: >> - atmel,sama5d4-pmc >> - microchip,sam9x60-pmc >> - microchip,sama7g5-pmc >> + - microchip,sam9x7-pmc >> - const: syscon > > Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the > driver change? Hi Krzysztof, This SoC has a new pmc driver and is not dependent on any other compatible as a fallback. So I think adding it in the enum makes sense. Correct me if I am wrong. The driver is in the series. Apologies for breaking the thread. I will send another version following your advice about splitting up the patch series. > > Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems. > With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- Thanks and Regards, Varshini Rajendran.
