On 18.07.2023 15:20, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:19:10 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> Due to the wild nature of the Qualcomm RPM Message RAM, we can't really >> use 'reg' to point to the MPM's slice of Message RAM without cutting into >> an already-defined RPM MSG RAM node used for GLINK and SMEM. >> >> Document passing the register space as a slice of SRAM through the >> qcom,rpm-msg-ram property. This also makes 'reg' deprecated. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml | 52 +++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.example.dtb: /example-0/remoteproc-rpm: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8998-rpm-proc', 'qcom,rpm-proc'] The missing schema is merged in -next via the qcom tree.. Could you give this a review? Konrad
