Re: [PATCH 3/9] mfd: mt6397: Split MediaTek MT6366 PMIC out of MT6358

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 03/08/23 09:42, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
The MT6366 PMIC is mostly, but not fully, compatible with MT6358. It has
a different set of regulators. Specifically, it lacks the camera related
VCAM* LDOs, but has additional VM18, VMDDR, and VSRAM_CORE LDOs.

Add a separate compatible for the MT6366 PMIC. The regulator cell for
this new entry uses a new compatible string matching MT6366.

Fixes: c47383f84909 ("mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6366 PMIC")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I agree in that the LDOs are a bit different, but that's handled by the
mt6358-regulator driver regardless of the actual devicetree compatible,
as that's selected through a chip_id check.

Finally, looking at the driver implementation itself, the addition of a
specific mt6366 compatible here seems redundant, because the actual HW is
 - Handled by drivers, but
 - Described by bindings

Any other opinions on this?

Regards,
Angelo

---
  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
index f6c1f80f94a4..3f8dfe60a59b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
@@ -206,6 +206,26 @@ static const struct mfd_cell mt6359_devs[] = {
  	},
  };
+static const struct mfd_cell mt6366_devs[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "mt6358-regulator",
+		.of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6366-regulator"
+	}, {
+		.name = "mt6358-rtc",
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_rtc_resources),
+		.resources = mt6358_rtc_resources,
+		.of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc",
+	}, {
+		.name = "mt6358-sound",
+		.of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-sound"
+	}, {
+		.name = "mt6358-keys",
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_keys_resources),
+		.resources = mt6358_keys_resources,
+		.of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-keys"
+	},
+};
+
  static const struct mfd_cell mt6397_devs[] = {
  	{
  		.name = "mt6397-rtc",
@@ -280,6 +300,14 @@ static const struct chip_data mt6359_core = {
  	.irq_init = mt6358_irq_init,
  };
+static const struct chip_data mt6366_core = {
+	.cid_addr = MT6358_SWCID,
+	.cid_shift = 8,
+	.cells = mt6366_devs,
+	.cell_size = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6366_devs),
+	.irq_init = mt6358_irq_init,
+};
+
  static const struct chip_data mt6397_core = {
  	.cid_addr = MT6397_CID,
  	.cid_shift = 0,
@@ -358,6 +386,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id mt6397_of_match[] = {
  	}, {
  		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6359",
  		.data = &mt6359_core,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6366",
+		.data = &mt6366_core,
  	}, {
  		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6397",
  		.data = &mt6397_core,





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux