On 8/2/2023 6:44 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 2.08.2023 15:13, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
On 8/2/2023 6:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 2.08.2023 11:59, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
Add dtsi for PMIC pm7550ba found in Qualcomm platforms.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Subject: "PMIC pm7550ba" -> "pm7550ba PMIC"
[...]
+
+ pm7550ba_eusb2_repeater: phy@fd00 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
A new compatible should be introduced, so that it goes like this:
compatible = "qcom,pm7550ba-eusb2-repeater", "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
Just a doubt, Since the compatible can be same why we need to introduce a new compatible.
Should every soc have a compatible string?
If it turns out that we need to add a quirk for PM7550BA 3 years down
the line, this approach lets us fix it for users that never updated
their device trees.
Yes. Got it.
Thanks,
Rohit
Konrad
