Hi Emil, Thank you for the review. On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:53 AM Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 22:37, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I/O Coherence Port (IOCP) provides an AXI interface for connecting > > external non-caching masters, such as DMA controllers. The accesses > > from IOCP are coherent with D-Caches and L2 Cache. > > > > IOCP is a specification option and is disabled on the Renesas RZ/Five > > SoC due to this reason IP blocks using DMA will fail. > > > > The Andes AX45MP core has a Programmable Physical Memory Attributes (PMA) > > block that allows dynamic adjustment of memory attributes in the runtime. > > It contains a configurable amount of PMA entries implemented as CSR > > registers to control the attributes of memory locations in interest. > > Below are the memory attributes supported: > > * Device, Non-bufferable > > * Device, bufferable > > * Memory, Non-cacheable, Non-bufferable > > * Memory, Non-cacheable, Bufferable > > * Memory, Write-back, No-allocate > > * Memory, Write-back, Read-allocate > > * Memory, Write-back, Write-allocate > > * Memory, Write-back, Read and Write-allocate > > > > More info about PMA (section 10.3): > > Link: http://www.andestech.com/wp-content/uploads/AX45MP-1C-Rev.-5.0.0-Datasheet.pdf > > > > As a workaround for SoCs with IOCP disabled CMO needs to be handled by > > software. Firstly OpenSBI configures the memory region as > > "Memory, Non-cacheable, Bufferable" and passes this region as a global > > shared dma pool as a DT node. With DMA_GLOBAL_POOL enabled all DMA > > allocations happen from this region and synchronization callbacks are > > implemented to synchronize when doing DMA transactions. > > <snip> > > +static const struct riscv_cache_ops ax45mp_cmo_ops = { > > + .wback = &ax45mp_dma_cache_wback, > > + .inv = &ax45mp_dma_cache_inv, > > + .wback_inv = &ax45mp_dma_cache_wback_inv, > > +}; > > Hi Prabhakar, > > If you're respinning this patchset anyway, I think you can mark this > struct as __initdata since it's only used by > riscv_noncoherent_register_cache_ops which copies the contents. > Agreed, I will update it in the next version. Cheers, Prabhakar