Hi Rob, On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 03:06:04PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > The OV5695 binding is almost the same as the OV5693 binding. The only > difference is 'clock-names' is defined for OV5695. However, the lack of > clock-names is an omission as the Linux OV5693 driver expects the same > 'xvclk' clock name. > > 'link-frequencies' is required by OV5693, but not OV5695. Just drop it > from being required. Expressing it conditionally would be ugly. It > shouldn't really be required either as the driver only supports 1 > frequency anyways. The correct way to address this would appear to be to add link-frequencies for both of these devices. I think I've seen one or two sensors of this class (raw, CSI-2/parallel, external clock etc.) with link frequencies documented as "fixed" --- which is probably a documentation issue more than anything else. Also see: <URL:https://hverkuil.home.xs4all.nl/spec/driver-api/camera-sensor.html#handling-clocks>. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus
