Hi Emil,
Thank you for the review.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:18 AM Emil Renner Berthing
<emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 22:36, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Introduce support for nonstandard noncoherent systems in the RISC-V
> > architecture. It enables function pointer support to handle cache
> > management in such systems.
> >
> > This patch adds a new configuration option called
> > "RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS." This option is a boolean flag that
> > depends on "RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT" and enables the function pointer
> > support for cache management in nonstandard noncoherent systems.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # tyre-kicking on a d1
> > ---
> > v9 -> v10
> > * Added __ro_after_init compiler attribute for noncoherent_cache_ops
> > * Renamed clean -> wback
> > * Renamed inval -> inv
> > * Renamed flush -> wback_inv
> >
> > v8 -> v9
> > * New patch
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 7 ++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h | 28 +++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/mm/pmem.c | 13 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index d9e451ac862a..42c86b13c5e1 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -265,6 +265,13 @@ config RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE
> > select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP
> >
> > +config RISCV_NONSTANDARD_CACHE_OPS
> > + bool
> > + depends on RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > + help
> > + This enables function pointer support for non-standard noncoherent
> > + systems to handle cache management.
> > +
> > config AS_HAS_INSN
> > def_bool $(as-instr,.insn r 51$(comma) 0$(comma) 0$(comma) t0$(comma) t0$(comma) zero)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..969cf1f1363a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dma-noncoherent.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASM_DMA_NONCOHERENT_H
> > +#define __ASM_DMA_NONCOHERENT_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * struct riscv_cache_ops - Structure for CMO function pointers
> > + *
> > + * @wback: Function pointer for cache writeback
> > + * @inv: Function pointer for invalidating cache
> > + * @wback_inv: Function pointer for flushing the cache (writeback + invalidating)
> > + */
> > +struct riscv_cache_ops {
> > + void (*wback)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size);
> > + void (*inv)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size);
> > + void (*wback_inv)(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size);
>
> Hi Prabhakar
>
> Just a quick question. After Arnd's patchset the
> arch_dma_cache{inv,wback,wback_inv} functions take a phys_addr_t and
> size_t, but here you want these callbacks to take a phys_addr_t and
> unsigned long instead. Why not keep them using size_t?
>
Agreed, I will update it to use size_t instead.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
