Hey, +CC Huacai & WANG. On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 03:49:42PM +0800, Yinbo Zhu wrote: > Loongson-2 platform support Power Management Controller (ACPI) and this > series patch was to add PM driver that base on dts and PM binding support. > > Change in v5: > 1. The patch "[PATCH v3 1/3] loongarch: export some arch-specific > pm interfaces" had been merged into linux-next tree thus this > v4 series patch need drop it and need depend on it and it's > patch link was: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230615091757.24686-2-zhuyinbo@xxxxxxxxxxx/ Just to note, it might be in linux-next, but more importantly it is also in v6.5-rc1, so there is no issue with dependencies. > 2. Swap the positions of compatible for 2k1000 and 2k0500. I noticed you sent a mail pinging the v4 of this series yesterday as it had not been picked up. Who do you actually expect to apply these patches? There does not appear to be a maintainer listed for the drivers/soc/loongson directory, just one for your GUTS driver. As a result, patches like <https://lore.kernel.org/all/a69170cb55cfc73e378b40ccf1d9c16f@xxxxxxxxxx/> have gone ignored. Granted, that patch is probably crap that does not apply, due to 208suo.com people sending corrupted patches, but you the point. More interestingly there is also <https://lore.kernel.org/all/40b324af-3483-4b3d-b65a-a97944aa4a70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/> which seems to have also gone missing (I don't see it in linux-next), despite some discussion about how the patch should be merged. Looks to me like drivers/soc/loongson/ needs someone to take responsibility for picking up patches for the directory & sending them to the soc maintainers (with a new MAINTAINERS entry reflecting that) so that patches don't fall through the cracks. Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
