On 25/07/2023 08:26, Fenglin Wu wrote: > > > On 7/25/2023 1:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 25/07/2023 07:41, Fenglin Wu wrote: >>> Add compatible string 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen2' for vibrator module inside >>> PMI632, PMI7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA. Also, add 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen1' >>> string for the SPMI vibrator inside PM8916 to maintain the completeness >>> of the hardware version history for SPMI vibrators. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml >>> index c8832cd0d7da..ab778714ad29 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml >>> @@ -11,10 +11,20 @@ maintainers: >>> >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> - enum: >>> - - qcom,pm8058-vib >>> - - qcom,pm8916-vib >>> - - qcom,pm8921-vib >>> + oneOf: >>> + - enum: >>> + - qcom,pm8058-vib >>> + - qcom,pm8916-vib >>> + - qcom,pm8921-vib >>> + - qcom,spmi-vib-gen1 >>> + - qcom,spmi-vib-gen2 >> >> Generic compatibles should not be alone. Drop both lines. > > Sure. I will remove 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen2'. > Should I also keep 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen1' as generic compatible and move > 'qcom,pm8916-vib' as its fallback as following? I would drop all of generic ones. Entirely remove qcom,spmi-vib-gen2 and qcom,spmi-vib-gen1. Use device specific compatibles names only. As fallback and as first compatible. Best regards, Krzysztof
