On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 6:38 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 08:23:22AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 10:29:57AM -0700, Drew Fustini wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:32:17AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 02:55:39PM -0700, Drew Fustini wrote: > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520-beaglev-ahead.dts > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > > > > > > Hmm, should this not be dual licensed? > > > > I notice the other th1520 stuff isn't either.. > > > > > > Good point, I'll resubmit with a dual license. > > > > > > Jisheng: are you okay with the other arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead files > > > changing to a dual license? > > > > When cooking the initial patch, I wrote the lpi4a dts files from > > scratch based on sipeed opened sch file, and currently only I made > > contributions to them, so it's easy to make the lpi4a dts files > > dual license. > > > > However, when constructing the th1520.dtsi, I refered the T-HEAD's > > opensourced yocto repo(in fact, that's the only sourcecode/doc I have > > at that time), and the license there is GPL-2.0. That's > > also the reason why copyright of Alibaba Group Holding Limited is > > added to th1520.dtsi. I'm not sure how to make th1520.dtsi dual > > license. At least, this needs help from Guo Ren. Any suggestion is > > appreciated. > > I think Guo Ren Acking the change should be sufficient. It'd be good to > have them dual licensed to make it easier for other projects to include > the dts files from Linux. Almost all of what we have at the moment is > dual licensed, other than the Canaan stuff & some board dts files I got > from customers that were only GPLed. Yes, dual license is okay for us. -- Best Regards Guo Ren
