On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:24:19 -0600 Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:19 AM Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Commit 679875d1d880 ("sc16is7xx: Separate GPIOs from modem control lines") > > and commit 21144bab4f11 ("sc16is7xx: Handle modem status lines") > > changed the function of the GPIOs pins to act as modem control > > lines without any possibility of selecting GPIO function. > > Requiring a new DT property is not fixing a kernel regression. You > should be returning the kernel to original behavior and then have a > new DT property for new behavior. Hi Rob, please read the entire patch history starting from V1 and you will understand why this course of action was not selected. > > As a consequence, applications that depends on GPIO lines configured > > by default as GPIO pins no longer work as expected. > > > > Also, the change to select modem control lines function was done only > > for channel A of dual UART variants (752/762). This was not documented > > in the log message. > > > > Allow to specify GPIO or modem control line function in the device > > tree, and for each of the ports (A or B). > > > > Do so by using the new device-tree property named > > "modem-control-line-ports" (property added in separate patch). > > That's not the name in the patch. We added a "nxp," prefix at some point. Do you want me to send a V9 only with this change? Hugo. > > When registering GPIO chip controller, mask-out GPIO pins declared as > > modem control lines according to this new "modem-control-line-ports" > > DT property. > > > > Boards that need to have GPIOS configured as modem control lines > > should add that property to their device tree. Here is a list of > > boards using the sc16is7xx driver in their device tree and that may > > need to be modified: > > arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts > > mips/boot/dts/ingenic/cu1830-neo.dts > > mips/boot/dts/ingenic/cu1000-neo.dts > > Then again, if no one cares about those boards needing a change then > it can be okay. > > > Rob > -- Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxx>