On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 02:06:01PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: > On 2023/7/14 19:52, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 03:14:59PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: > >> After communicating with colleagues in SoC FE, I learned that PCLK and > >> SSPCLK were homologous on JH7110. He said that SSPCLK would divide the > >> frequency internally anyway, and there was no need for external part frequency, > >> so he directly gave them together. > >> So, should I call this clock ssp_apb or keep it SSPCLK? > > I'd expect this to be handled in the DTS for the SoC - connect both > > clocks the binding requires to whatever the upstream clock is, it's not > > clear to me that any binding change is required. > You mean binding two clocks, with the same clock source? Then there is no > need to modify YAML. Yes, exactly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
