On 12/9/2014 5:27 PM, Varka Bhadram wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 06:24 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
Document the I2C device tree binding for Broadcom iProc family of
SoCs
Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.txt | 37
++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81f982c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/brcm,iproc-i2c.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+Broadcom iProc I2C controller
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible:
+ Must be "brcm,iproc-i2c"
+
+- reg:
+ Define the base and range of the I/O address space that contain
the iProc
+ I2C controller registers
+
+- interrupts:
+ Should contain the I2C interrupt
+
+- clock-frequency:
+ This is the I2C bus clock. Need to be either 100000 or 400000
+
+- #address-cells:
+ Always 1 (for I2C addresses)
+
+- #size-cells:
+ Always 0
+
All the properties defined with two lines of statements.
Why cant they be with single line statement, like:
compatible: Must be "brcm,iproc-i2c"
reg: Define the base and range of the I/O address space that
contain the iProc I2C controller registers
....
I thought making them two lines are more readable (and obviously that's
very subjective, :)). But more importantly, it matches the format of
other Broadcom iProc/Cygnus devicetree binding documents that are
currently in progress of upstreaming.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
