Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: add phy-supply support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23-07-17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 18:43, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Document the common phy-supply property to be able to specify a phy
> > regulator.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > index 363b3e3ea3a60..f66d1839cf561 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ properties:
> >        can be passive (no SW requirement), and requires that the MAC operate
> >        in a different mode than the PHY in order to function.
> >  
> > +  phy-supply:
> > +    description: PHY regulator
> > +
> 
> Isn't this property of the PHY? Why would the Ethernet controller play
> with a supply of a phy?

Because this is the current state. Please check the all other MACs
handling the phy-supply (if supported). Some of them handling it under
the mdio-node (not the phy-node) but most bindings do specify this on
MAC level (e.g. FEC, DWMAC (suni, rk)).

I agree that the phy sould handle this but this would be a lot more
effort and since the dwmac-sun8i/rk bindings do support this on MAC
level I would keep it that way.

Regards,
  Marco



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux