On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:50:18PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 17.07.2023 18:28, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:19:22PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> The GPU_CC block is powered by VDD_CX. Describe that.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> index 29b5b388cd94..bfaaa1801a4d 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ gpucc: clock-controller@5990000 {
> >> clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> >> <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_CLK_SRC>,
> >> <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>;
> >> + power-domains = <&rpmpd SM6115_VDDCX>;
> >> + required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_low_svs>;
> >
> > Where is this required-opp coming from? The clocks in gpucc seem to have
> > different voltage requirements depending on the rates, but we usually
> > handle that in the OPP tables of the consumer.
> The only lower levels defined for this SoC are VDD_MIN and VDD_RET,
> but quite obviously the GPU won't work then
>
The levels needed for the GPU clocks to run should be in the GPU OPP
table though, just like e.g. sdhc2_opp_table for the SDCC clocks.
I still don't really understand why this is specified here. :)
Stephan
