Hey Nicolas, On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 12:09:24PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > On 08/06/2023 at 18:49, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:38:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > For reference, anything done by Arm, Linaro or NVIDIA employees is > > > > okay to relicense to dual license. > > > Ah cool, that's good to know, thanks. > > > Perhaps I should try to get a similar edict issued for Microchip ones. > > > @Nicolas, does that sound reasonable? > > > > Well, we can work it out internally, indeed. But is there a public statement > > about this somewhere? > > You mean, is there a public statement about Arm/Linaro/Nvidia being okay > with relicensing bindings as dual license? This was sitting at the end of my queue, don't recall following this up internally. Getting an edict might be more hassle than it is worth & I guess I am always CCed on bindings to Ack them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
