On Thu 06 Jul 2023 at 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/07/2023 09:15, Jerome Brunet wrote: >>>> + then: >>>> + properties: >>>> + clock-names: >>>> + minItems: 2 >>>> + items: >>>> + - const: xtal >>>> + - const: mpeg-clk >>>> + - const: ext-32k-0 >>>> + - const: ext-32k-1 >>>> + - const: ext-32k-2 >>> >>> As the names are always the same, move this to top-level and just set >>> the length here (except the constraints are the same as top-level, so >>> you can just drop this if/then). >> >> If this is done, aren't we losing information ? >> >> For example, "ext-32k-1" would become valid with a g12a as long as the >> number of clocks is alright, which it is not. > > How it would be valid? It would be fourth item but only three are allowed. > I missed that the order in 'items' mattered. Thanks for the clarification. >> >> I'm not concerned by the automated verification, more the information >> provided to the users, which we used to have in the txt format. > > No information is lost here, unless you claim that entries are entirely > different? > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
