Hi Biju, On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 3:13 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM > > To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>; Magnus Damm > > <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof > > Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij > > <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Prabhakar Mahadev > > Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Include pinmap in > > RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK() macro > > > > Hi Biju, > > > > Thank you for the review. > > > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 12:42 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Prabhakar, > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 1:05 PM > > > > To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>; Magnus Damm > > > > <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij > > > > <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Biju Das > > > > <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Prabhakar > > > > <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad > > > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Include pinmap in > > > > RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK() macro > > > > > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Currently we assume all the port pins are sequential ie always PX_0 > > > > to PX_n (n=1..7) exist, but on RZ/Five SoC we have additional pins > > > > P19_1 to > > > > P28_5 which have holes in them, for example only one pin on port19 > > > > is available and that is P19_1 and not P19_0. > > > > > > > > So to handle such cases include pinmap for each port which would > > > > indicate the pin availability on each port. With this we also get > > > > additional pin validation, for example on the RZ/G2L SOC P0 has two > > > > pins > > > > P0_1 and P0_0 but with DT/SYSFS could use the P0_2-P0_7. > > > > > > > > While at it, update rzg2l_validate_gpio_pin() to use the port pinmap > > > > to validate the gpio pin. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > > > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c | 167 > > > > ++++++++++++------------ > > > > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > > > b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > > > index 9511d920565e..a0c2e585e765 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > > > @@ -67,10 +67,12 @@ > > > > PIN_CFG_FILCLKSEL) > > > > > > > > /* > > > > - * n indicates number of pins in the port, a is the register index > > > > - * and f is pin configuration capabilities supported. > > > > + * m indicates the bitmap of supported pins, n indicates number > > > > + * of pins in the port, a is the register index and f is pin > > > > + * configuration capabilities supported. > > > > */ > > > > -#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f) (((n) << 28) | ((a) << > > 20) | > > > > (f)) > > > > +#define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(m, n, a, f) ((UL(m) << 32) | > > (UL(n) << 28) > > > > | ((a) << 20) | (f)) > > > > > > I guess, you can still achieve RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f) with > > > ((UL(PINMAP(n)) << 32) | (UL(n) << 28) | ((a) << 20) | (f)) > > > > > > #define PINMAP(n) GENMASK(n,0) ?? Then you don't need to modify > > rzg2l_gpio_configs. > > > > > Good point, but this would work if port pins didn't have any holes. > > For example on RZ/Five port P19 we have P19_1 pin only and P19_0 is not > > available (and similarly for port P25 we have P25_1). > > Maybe introduce a helper macro to address this case. > > #define RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK_WITH_HOLES(m, n, a, f) for these 2 cases > > and use RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_PACK(n, a, f) for the one without holes. > Agreed will do. Cheers, Prabhakar
