On 27.06.2023 22:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> The regulator setup was likely copied from other SoCs by mistake. Just
> like SM6125 the DSI PHY on this platform is not getting power from a
> regulator but from the MX power domain.
>
> Fixes: 572e9fd6d14a ("drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for QCM2290")
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Konrad
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> index 3ce45b023e63..31deda1c664a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> @@ -1087,8 +1087,6 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs = {
>
> const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs = {
> .has_phy_lane = true,
> - .regulator_data = dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators,
> - .num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators),
> .ops = {
> .enable = dsi_14nm_phy_enable,
> .disable = dsi_14nm_phy_disable,
>
