On 2023-06-26 11:41:39, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 25.06.2023 21:18, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2023-06-24 03:42:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote: > >>> Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF > >>> TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly) > >> We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a > >> balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare > >> working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on > >> this one.. > > > > I don't understand what you mean by "mistake" at all. Yes the DPU > > catalog portion of this series sat in my local branch for a very long > > time. Yes it had to be rebased on top of conflicts many many times. > > > > However, that time has also been used to fix and extend DPU where > > necessary, instead of submitting a half-broken or half-incomplete > > catalog entry... > > > > Re "we overstayed": you could have asked to clean up and send my patch, > > so I don't take this as a mistake on my part as you are completely aware > > of my time schedule ;) > I didn't mean to pick on you. I just wanted to emphasize that a more > upstream-forward approach would have saved us quite some time on the > rebasing and cleaning-up front. That is how it comes across ;) - our dream is all about upstream-first but as you know this becomes a mess really quickly when things are blocked on dependencies and you're working on 5 different features and testing across ±8 different Sony platforms on ±14 different devices at once... all in a limited portion of free time. Fwiw cleaning-up would have had to happen either way, and would have taken the same amount of time regardless of whether this series is submitted now or two months ago. > >> Konrad > >> , and most > > > > Also here, don't forget to re-quote my message if you break half-way in > > the line. > Ugh. All the time I've been doing this I thought thunderfox was smart > enough to do it for me. Apparently not and you're the 1st one to point > that out. You're welcome! (Though I thought it should be visible in Thunderburd, unless you're not in plaintext mode? Does it still show the "this is quoted" line in front of the broken sentence?) - Marijn
