On 20/06/2023 11:32, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > >> And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create >> something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device >> specific compatible thus device specific filename. > > qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml seems to be for ULPI mode phy and the > driver we are introducing is for UTMI. We would have to > modify phy-qcom-usb-hs.c to accomodate M31. Will that be > acceptable to phy-qcom-usb-hs.c owners/maintainers? We don't talk about drivers here but bindings. Why would you need to modify the driver when introducing new binding for different device? Best regards, Krzysztof
