On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 12:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 20/06/2023 19:24, Jassi Brar wrote: > >>> +properties: > >>> + $nodename: > >>> + const: '/' > >>> + compatible: > >>> + oneOf: > >>> + - items: > >>> + - enum: > >>> + - socionext,developer-box > >>> + - socionext,synquacer > >>> + - const: socionext,sc2a11b > >> > >> That's quite different change. > >> > > So it is not carrying your ack. > > > >> What is synquacer in this case? You claim > >> now it is a board, but based on previous discussions and U-Boot source > >> it does not look like such. > >> > > I never made that claim. I said Kojima-san will confirm. He informed > > Synquacer is a brand name. > > > > Currently no code internally or externally differentiates between > > SC2A11B and Synquacer and we might as well keep living with Synquacer > > only. This patch is an attempt to be accurate. > > Then the patch is not correct, because synquacer is not a board. We > should anyway choose only one for adding to documentation. > OK. I will revert to using the brand name Synquacer. thnkx
