Re: [PATCHv2] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add Synquacer platforms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/06/2023 19:24, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> +  $nodename:
>>> +    const: '/'
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - socionext,developer-box
>>> +              - socionext,synquacer
>>> +          - const: socionext,sc2a11b
>>
>> That's quite different change.
>>
> So it is not carrying your ack.
> 
>> What is synquacer in this case? You claim
>> now it is a board, but based on previous discussions and U-Boot source
>> it does not look like such.
>>
> I never made that claim. I said Kojima-san will confirm. He informed
> Synquacer is a brand name.
> 
> Currently no code internally or externally differentiates between
> SC2A11B and Synquacer and we might as well keep living with Synquacer
> only. This patch is an attempt to be accurate.

Then the patch is not correct, because synquacer is not a board. We
should anyway choose only one for adding to documentation.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux