On 14/06/2023 11:28, Stanley Chang wrote: > Add the documentation explain the property about Realtek USB PHY driver. > > Realtek DHC (digital home center) RTD SoCs support DWC3 XHCI USB > controller. Added the driver to drive the USB 2.0 PHY transceivers. > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3 to v4 change: > 1. Remove the parameter and non hardware properties from dts. > 2. Using the compatible data included the config and parameter > in driver. > v2 to v3 change: > 1. Broken down into two patches, one for each of USB 2 & 3. > 2. Add more description about Realtek RTD SoCs architecture. > 3. Removed parameter v1 support for simplification. > 4. Revised the compatible name for fallback compatible. > 5. Remove some properties that can be set in the driver. > v1 to v2 change: > Add phy-cells for generic phy driver > --- > .../bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml | 145 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..cfd77143475c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +# Copyright 2023 Realtek Semiconductor Corporation > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/realtek,usb2phy.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Realtek DHC SoCs USB 2.0 PHY > + > +maintainers: > + - Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: > + Realtek USB 2.0 PHY support the digital home center (DHC) RTD series SoCs. > + The USB 2.0 PHY driver is designed to support the XHCI controller. The SoCs > + support multiple XHCI controllers. One PHY device node maps to one XHCI > + controller. > + > + RTD1295/RTD1619 SoCs USB > + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers. > + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on some > + controllers. > + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + |- usb3phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + |- usb3phy -- phy#0 > + > + RTD1395 SoCs USB > + The USB architecture includes two XHCI controllers. > + The controller#0 has one USB 2.0 PHY. The controller#1 includes two USB 2.0 > + PHY. > + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + |- phy#1 > + > + RTD1319/RTD1619b SoCs USB > + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers. > + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on controllers#2. > + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + |- usb3phy -- phy#0 > + > + RTD1319d SoCs USB > + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers. > + Each xhci maps to one USB 2.0 PHY and map one USB 3.0 PHY on controllers#0. > + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + |- usb3phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + > + RTD1312c/RTD1315e SoCs USB > + The USB architecture includes three XHCI controllers. > + Each XHCI maps to one USB 2.0 PHY. > + XHCI controller#0 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#1 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + XHCI controller#2 -- usb2phy -- phy#0 > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + items: > + - enum: > + - realtek,rtd1295-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1312c-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1315e-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1319-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1395-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1395-usb2phy-2port > + - realtek,rtd1619-usb2phy > + - realtek,rtd1619b-usb2phy > + - const: realtek,usb2phy That's not what your driver is saying... This patchset has random set of changes. I suggest to drop "realtek,usb2phy". > + > + reg: > + items: > + - description: PHY data registers > + - description: PHY control registers > + > + "#phy-cells": > + const: 0 > + > + nvmem-cells: > + maxItems: 2 > + description: > + Phandles to nvmem cell that contains the trimming data. > + If unspecified, default value is used. > + > + nvmem-cell-names: > + items: > + - const: usb-dc-cal > + - const: usb-dc-dis > + description: > + The following names, which correspond to each nvmem-cells. > + usb-dc-cal is the driving level for each phy specified via efuse. > + usb-dc-dis is the disconnection level for each phy specified via efuse. > + > + realtek,inverse-hstx-sync-clock: > + description: > + For one of the phys of RTD1619b SoC, the synchronous clock of the > + high-speed tx must be inverted. So this property is used to set the > + inverted clock. Drop last sentence, it is redundant. > + type: boolean > + > + realtek,driving-level: > + description: > + Each board or port may have a different driving capability. This > + will adjust the driving level value if the value is not the default. I don't understand it. What is "driving capability" and if each port can have it different, why do you need property for this? You mention some default - why it is not expressed as "default: xx"? What do the values mean? > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > + minimum: 0 > + maximum: 31 > + > + realtek,driving-compensate: > + description: > + For RTD1315e SoC, the driving level can be adjusted by reading the > + efuse table. Therefore, this property provides drive compensation for > + different boards with different drive capabilities. if driving level can be read from nvmem, why do you have realtek,driving-level in the first place? Don't you miss here some allOf making this constrained per variant? "Therefore" means "for that reason" or "as a consequence". How is this property a consequence of reading driving level from efuse? Is it then mutually exclusive with "realtek,driving-level"? But your schema does not express it. > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32 > + minimum: -8 > + maximum: 8 > + > + realtek,disconnection-compensate: > + description: > + This adjusts the disconnection level compensation for the different > + boards with different disconnection level. > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32 > + minimum: -8 > + maximum: 8 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - "#phy-cells" > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + usb_port0_usb2phy: usb-phy@13214 { > + compatible = "realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy", "realtek,usb2phy"; > + reg = <0x13214 0x4>, <0x28280 0x4>; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > + > + realtek,driving-level = <0xe>; Why this example is so empty? You have at least 6 more properties which should be shown here. Best regards, Krzysztof