On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer). > Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that. > > Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..72554a4f1c92 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/socionext/synquacer.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Socionext Synquacer platform > + > +maintainers: > + - Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@xxxxxxxxxx> > + - Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: > + Socionext SC2A11B (Synquacer) SoC based boards > + > +properties: > + $nodename: > + const: '/' > + compatible: > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - socionext,developer-box > + - const: socionext,synquacer Last compatible looks very generic. Too generic. Are you sure it uniquely identifies one specific SoC (not family, not generation, not series)? Best regards, Krzysztof