On 16/06/2023 07:29, Shawn Sung (宋孝謙) wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > Thanks for the reminder, because MT8188 is not related to MT8173, How does it matter? > I’ll > keep it as it is for now, however, I do find that MT8195 doesn’t exist > in this dt-bindings which it should be, so there may be conflicts when > this series is going to be merged. Don't top post. No, rebase on current next and implement my comment. Best regards, Krzysztof
