Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for the reminder, because MT8188 is not related to MT8173, I’ll keep it as it is for now, however, I do find that MT8195 doesn’t exist in this dt-bindings which it should be, so there may be conflicts when this series is going to be merged. Best regards, Hsiao Chien Sung On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 10:28 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On 14/06/2023 09:31, Hsiao Chien Sung wrote: > > Add compatible name for MediaTek MT8188 MERGE. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml | 3 > +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.y > aml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.y > aml > > index eead5cb8636e..5c678695162e 100644 > > --- > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.y > aml > > +++ > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.y > aml > > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ properties: > > - items: > > - const: mediatek,mt6795-disp-merge > > - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-merge > > + - items: > > + - const: mediatek,mt8188-disp-merge > > + - const: mediatek,mt8195-disp-merge > > Linux next has something entirely different. I don't know the base > here, > but it's really, really different and it suggests you should add > mt8188 > to an enum with mt8173. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
