On 12/02/2014 09:25 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
+/* MPU L2 Register Defines */
+#define ALTR_MPUL2_CONTROL_OFFSET 0x100
+#define ALTR_MPUL2_CTL_CACHE_EN_MASK BIT(0)
These are just standard PL310 register definitions, no?
Yes.
[...]
+static void *ocram_alloc_mem(size_t size, void **other)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ struct gen_pool *gp;
+ void *sram_addr;
+
+ np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "altr,ocram-edac");
+ if (!np)
+ return NULL;
Don't you need to have a corresponding of_node_put?
Is this ever called before the code above has probed? Can't you keep
this information around rather than probing it every time?
This is only used for testing so it happens infrequently and always
after the probe has finished.
These error injection functions will not be part of the standard
distribution for our board so it was cleaner to leave it out.
+
+ gp = of_get_named_gen_pool(np, "iram", 0);
+ if (!gp)
+ return NULL;
+
+ sram_addr = (void *)gen_pool_alloc(gp, size);
+ if (!sram_addr)
+ return NULL;
+
+ memset(sram_addr, 0, size);
Is it safe to do a memset to the sram? How is it mapped?
I checked the gen_pool and the memory may not be contiguous. I will fix
this. Thanks!
[...]
+static void *l2_alloc_mem(size_t size, void **other)
+{
+ struct device *dev = *other;
+ void *ptemp = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!ptemp)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* Make sure everything is written out */
+ wmb();
+ flush_cache_all();
Doesn't this just flush out _to_ the L2 (and not beyond)? Even then I
don't think that's safe with the MMU enabled.
Why is the flush necessary?
flush_cache_all() maps to flush_kern_all() which cleans all the cache
levels up to the level of coherency which includes L2 in it.
This flush ensures the data is in a known state (zero) before I inject
the errors for testing L2 ECC.
[...]
+static int altr_l2_dependencies(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ void __iomem *base)
+{
+ u32 control;
+ struct regmap *l2_vbase;
+
+ control = readl(base) & ALTR_L2_ECC_EN_MASK;
+ if (!control) {
+ edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
+ "L2: No ECC present, or ECC disabled\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ l2_vbase = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("arm,pl310-cache");
+ if (IS_ERR(l2_vbase)) {
+ edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
+ "L2:regmap for arm,pl310-cache lookup failed.\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
I must NAK any use of the L2 as a syscon device. It's simply not a
register file that was intended to be shared. I appreciate that you only
want to check something very simple, but we should use a higher level
API for that (and we should add one if we do not already have one)
OK. I didn't know of a way to read that register otherwise. I will
rework this.
+
+ regmap_read(l2_vbase, ALTR_MPUL2_CONTROL_OFFSET, &control);
+ if (!(control & ALTR_MPUL2_CTL_CACHE_EN_MASK)) {
+ edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "L2: Cache disabled\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+const struct edac_device_prv_data l2ecc_data = {
+ .setup = altr_l2_dependencies,
+ .ce_clear_mask = 0,
+ .ue_clear_mask = 0,
+#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
+ .eccmgr_sysfs_attr = altr_l2_sysfs_attributes,
+ .alloc_mem = l2_alloc_mem,
+ .free_mem = l2_free_mem,
+ .ecc_enable_mask = ALTR_L2_ECC_EN_MASK,
+ .ce_set_mask = (ALTR_L2_ECC_EN_MASK | ALTR_L2_ECC_INJS_MASK),
+ .ue_set_mask = (ALTR_L2_ECC_EN_MASK | ALTR_L2_ECC_INJD_MASK),
+ .trig_alloc_sz = ALTR_TRIG_L2C_BYTE_SIZE,
+#endif
+};
+
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_L2C */
+
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Thor Thayer");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EDAC Driver for Altera SDRAM Controller");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EDAC Driver for Altera Memories");
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
