Le jeudi 08 juin 2023 à 16:06 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno a écrit :
> Il 08/06/23 15:11, Nicolas Dufresne ha scritto:
> > Le jeudi 08 juin 2023 à 07:27 +0000, Yunfei Dong (董云飞) a écrit :
> > > Hi Nicolas,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review.
> > > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 21:41 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > > > you have verified the sender or the content.
> > > > Hi Yunfei,
> > > >
> > > > Le mercredi 07 juin 2023 à 16:48 +0800, Yunfei Dong a écrit :
> > > > > 'mtk_vcodec_debug' and 'mtk_vcodec_err' depends on 'mtk_vcodec_ctx'
> > > > > to get the index of each instance, using the index directly instead
> > > > > of with 'mtk_vcodec_ctx'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h | 26 ++-
> > > > > .../vcodec/vdec/vdec_av1_req_lat_if.c | 105 +++++++-----
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_if.c | 62 ++++---
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_req_if.c | 39 +++--
> > > > > .../vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_req_multi_if.c | 80 +++++----
> > > > > .../vcodec/vdec/vdec_hevc_req_multi_if.c | 67 ++++----
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp8_if.c | 54 ++++---
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp8_req_if.c | 46 +++---
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_if.c | 152 ++++++++++--
> > > > ------
> > > > > .../vcodec/vdec/vdec_vp9_req_lat_if.c | 84 ++++++----
> > > > > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_vpu_if.c | 59 ++++---
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c | 86 +++++-----
> > > > > .../mediatek/vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c | 48 +++---
> > > > > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c | 64 ++++----
> > > > > 14 files changed, 565 insertions(+), 407 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h
> > > > > index ecb0bdf3a4f4..ddc12c3e2983 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_util.h
> > > > > @@ -31,9 +31,8 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dev;
> > > > > #define mtk_v4l2_err(fmt, args...) \
> > > > > pr_err("[MTK_V4L2][ERROR] " fmt "\n", ##args)
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define mtk_vcodec_err(h, fmt, args...)\
> > > > > -pr_err("[MTK_VCODEC][ERROR][%d]: " fmt "\n",\
> > > > > - ((struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *)(h)->ctx)->id, ##args)
> > > > > +#define mtk_vcodec_err(plat_dev, inst_id, fmt,
> > > > args...) \
> > > > > +dev_err(&(plat_dev)->dev, "[MTK_VCODEC][ERROR][%d]: " fmt "\n",
> > > > inst_id, ##args)
> > > > >
> > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> > > > > extern int mtk_v4l2_dbg_level;
> > > > > @@ -46,27 +45,24 @@ extern int mtk_vcodec_dbg;
> > > > > __func__, __LINE__, ##args); \
> > > > > } while (0)
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define mtk_vcodec_debug(h, fmt, args...) \
> > > > > -do { \
> > > > > -if (mtk_vcodec_dbg) \
> > > > > -dev_dbg(&(((struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *)(h)->ctx)->dev->plat_dev-
> > > > > dev), \
> > > > > -"[MTK_VCODEC][%d]: %s, %d " fmt "\n", \
> > > > > -((struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *)(h)->ctx)->id, \
> > > > > -__func__, __LINE__, ##args); \
> > > > > +#define mtk_vcodec_debug(plat_dev, inst_id, fmt,
> > > > args...) \
> > > > > +do
> > > > {
> > > > \
> > > > > +if
> > > > (mtk_vcodec_dbg)
> > > > \
> > > > > +dev_dbg(&(plat_dev)->dev, "[MTK_VCODEC][%d]: %s, %d " fmt "\n", \
> > > >
> > > > At least in this patch, you systematically pass plat_dev as
> > > > <something>->ctx->dev->plat_dev, which is quite long and verbose, any
> > > > reason we
> > > > can't just pass that <something> here ? We can follow the same
> > > > structure path
> > > > for both encoder/decoder ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > In order to separate encode and decoder, need to define two different
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_dec_ctx and struct mtk_vcodec_enc_ctx.
> > >
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_ctx won't be used again, need to use platform device
> > > to print dev_dbg and dev_err.
> > >
> > > encoder and decoder using the same interface to print log message.
> >
> > Just a reminder, I'm just making suggestions, there is no strict action required
> > here other then a discussion to try and make the logging a bit more light.
> >
> > My points was that C macros don't care about types, so if you keep the path to
> > the platform device the same (ctx->dev->plat_dev), you could just pass the ctx
> > as argument. What I don't know though myself, is if this is actually feasible in
> > all code path, but considering you had access to the instance previously, I
> > thought it should.
> >
>
> One macro used to access two different structures?
>
> Please, no.
Its up to you. I do think this is an empty statement. Still believe we avoid
this code "deterioration". One can always be creative to workaround your
concerns.
struct base_ctx {
struct dev dev;
}
struct enc_ctx {
struct base_ctx;
...
}
struct src_ctx {
...
}
But this is in no way more safe then a naming convention, this is macro calls,
its not typed.
Nicolas
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
> > regards,
> > Nicolas
> >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yunfei Dong
> > > > > +inst_id, __func__, __LINE__, ##args); \
> > > > > } while (0)
> > > > > #else
> > > > > #define mtk_v4l2_debug(level, fmt, args...) pr_debug(fmt, ##args)
> > > > >
> > > > > -#define mtk_vcodec_debug(h, fmt, args...)\
> > > > > -pr_debug("[MTK_VCODEC][%d]: " fmt "\n",\
> > > >
> > > ...snip...
> >
>
