On 06/06/2023 12:57, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >> >> Now for actual paragraph: >> >> "If yes, then it means we would need to list *all* the nand chip >> properties in each schema," >> >> No, why? I don't understand. Use the same pattern as all other bindings, >> this is not special. Absolutely all have the same behavior, e.g. >> mentioned leds. You finish with unevaluatedProps and you're done, which >> is what I wrote here long, long time ago. > > Maybe because so far we did not bother referencing another schema in > the NAND chip nodes? For your hint to work I guess we should have, in > each controller binding, something along: > > patternProperties: > "^nand@[a-f0-9]$": > type: object > + $ref: nand-chip.yaml# > properties: > > If yes, please ignore the series sent aside, I will work on it again > and send a v2. nand-controller.yaml has it, so ideally each device binding should not need it, because it already references nand-controller.yaml. However if it doesn't work, then you need nand-chip in each device binding. Best regards, Krzysztof
