Hi Nishanth,
On 6/6/2023 2:19 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 22:31-20230605, Kumar, Udit wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
index 37c24b077b6a..c13246a9ed8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
[...]
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ &main_i2c6 {
&wkup_i2c0 {
status = "okay";
pinctrl-names = "default";
- pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default &eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default>, <&eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
clock-frequency = <400000>;
Why we need more than 2 pio lines for i2c node ,
pio lines? I am not sure I understand. If you are suggesting
eeprom_wp_pins to be moved to the eeprom node, It is probably
un-related to this series, but OK, i think it is probably a valid
change (unless Robert sees a reason why he did it the way he did).
correct, I am suggesting to move eeprom_wp_pins_default to eeprom node.
i2c needs 2 lines which are defined in wkup_i2c0_pins_default, Adding
eeprom_wp_pins_default will not be true representation of i2c node.
It will be good to have similar changes in main_i2c1 and main_i2c5 node
for csi0_gpio_pins_default and csi1_gpio_pins_default.
