On 22:31-20230605, Kumar, Udit wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
> > index 37c24b077b6a..c13246a9ed8f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
[...]
> > @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ &main_i2c6 {
> > &wkup_i2c0 {
> > status = "okay";
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > - pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default &eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default>, <&eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
> > clock-frequency = <400000>;
>
> Why we need more than 2 pio lines for i2c node ,
pio lines? I am not sure I understand. If you are suggesting
eeprom_wp_pins to be moved to the eeprom node, It is probably
un-related to this series, but OK, i think it is probably a valid
change (unless Robert sees a reason why he did it the way he did).
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
