On 5/30/2023 8:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 26/05/2023 18:11, Kathiravan T wrote:
qrng node address is mentioned incorrectly. Lets fix it.
Reported-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Note: Only compilation and dtbs_check is checked. Also dependent on the
below series, no functional dependencies
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230526125305.19626-1-quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
index 0f6d6c6daed2..5d2cc0caf5a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
};
- prng: qrng@e1000 {
+ prng: qrng@e3000 {
This was fixed some time ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419211856.79332-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks, I didn't notice your patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
