On 30/05/2023 10:39, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > Hi Conor > > On 5/29/23 20:05, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:20:27PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >>> STM32 family is extended by the addition of the STM32MP25 SoCs. It is composed >>> of 4 SoCs: STM32MP251, STM32MP253, STM32MP255 and STM32MP257. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml >>> index 4af5b8f4f803..7d7ca33d2e61 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml >>> @@ -161,6 +161,15 @@ properties: >>> - const: phytec,phycore-stm32mp157c-som >>> - const: st,stm32mp157 >>> >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32mp251 >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32mp253 >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32mp255 >>> + - items: >>> + - const: st,stm32mp257 >> >> I assume the slightly odd format is just to avoid churn when adding >> the board compatibles. > > Yes, exactly. > I don't get it. How are you going to extend it? Or rather - what are you documenting here? If these are SoCs, then this is not valid. We do not allow these alone. No, please drop it. Best regards, Krzysztof
