On 22:37-20230531, Kumar, Udit wrote:
[...]
> > + secure_proxy_mcu: mailbox@2a480000 {
> I think, we should start name as mailbox@2a380000
> > + compatible = "ti,am654-secure-proxy";
> > + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> > + reg-names = "target_data", "rt", "scfg";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x2a480000 0x0 0x80000>,
> > + <0x0 0x2a380000 0x0 0x80000>,
> > + <0x0 0x2a400000 0x0 0x80000>;
>
> I think, we should have increasing order for reg. Unless there is some
> strong reason to keep in this way.
Binding is defined this way - the items section in the binding
enforces the order. As a result the first reg entry(target_data)
address causes the node name.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
