Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: display: st,stm32-dsi: Remove unnecessary fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/05/2023 15:38, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> 
> On 5/30/23 15:30, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>> On 5/30/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:13:57 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>>> "#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not
>>>> mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope
>>>> of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address
>>>> and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml | 2 --
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
>>> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
>>> incorrect. These may not be new warnings
>> I checked it before merging the series on stm32-next tree. I didn't get this
>> error. I didn't check commit per commit.
>>
>> Do you get this error after merging the whole series ?
> 
> 
> I think this is because of the order of the patches within the serie. The patch
> correcting the yaml is before those modifying the device-trees. This could
> explain warnings rise up when checking patch per patch. However I did not get
> any errors on top of  the whole serie.

Yeah. Ignore the report if you tested it by yourself.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux