On 5/30/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:13:57 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
"#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not
mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope
of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address
and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings
I checked it before merging the series on stm32-next tree. I didn't get
this error. I didn't check commit per commit.
Do you get this error after merging the whole series ?
Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.
Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1787034
dsi@40016c00: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected)
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dtb
dsi@5a000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected)
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1-scmi.dtb
