On 29.05.2023 17:31, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 04:26:09PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 29/05/2023 16:24, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>> On 29/05/2023 16:00, Stephan Gerhold wrote: >>>> Do you mean update the examples in the yaml bindings >>> >>> Yep. >>> >>> grep dsi0_out Documentation/* -r | grep qcom >>> grep dsi0_in Documentation/* -r | grep qcom >>> >>> Consider splitting this patch out and fixing up[1] Documentation/* and >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/*.dts[i] , arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/*.dts[i] >>> >>> We may as well be consistent everywhere. >>> >>> --- >>> bod >> >> >> [1] In a standalone series >> > > Right I will check this and try to adjust the documentation and/or the > other SoCs in a separate series. Agreed, bindings don't really care about labels but they set examples. I'd really appreciate if you could take care of that, Stephan. I would still prefer to apply it for > 8916/8939 as part of this series since I have some unrelated follow-up > changes that would just cause unnecessary conflicts for Bjorn otherwise. > > We already have most newer SoCs using the naming convention in this > patch so it definitely does not make the existing situation any worse. :) Definitely! Konrad > > Thanks, > Stephan
